Thursday, April 21, 2011

PART 9 - THE NINETEENTH CENTURY AESTHETIC VIEW

The eighteenth century was dominated by British and French aesthetic theory with its strong interest in social theories of art but the nineteenth century as we will soon see was shaped by German thinkers who were fascinated by universal psychological and spiritual experiences. Some of the key names of the era were: Goethe, Humboldt, Schiller, Schelling, Schlegel, kant, Hegel, Schleiermacher, Wackenroder, Novalis and Schopenhauer. The overall mood of the period resonated with humanity's inherent need to establish a harmony with nature and achieve the mind's need for unity and purpose.

Nature was a model of what art and harmonious human existence should be for nature revealed clarity, utility and order. So it occurred to thinkers that a well-functioning mind should likewise be clear, balanced and well-functioning. Art that was based on the appreciative observation of natural pattern, balance, form, beauty, etc. would therefore have natural characteristics and in this way would assist humankind in achieving rational harmony and purposeful tranquility in thought and action.

There was a renewed interest in Greek Classical art at the beginning of the 19th century because Greek art and architecture featured unity, clarity and naturalness. This love of Classical art was a carryover of the rationalism of 18th century thinkers like Thomas Jefferson. It was evident to people like him that the Greek sculptors for instance had studied the human body and discerned its natural perfection and lawful construction. The beauty of Greek art had already prompted the Renaissance artist to copy Greek examples but the nineteenth century saw more of nature in Greek art and less of the philosophical idealism of Plato and Aristotle. The nineteenth century was more organic putting nature and observation firsthand and Greek philosophy in a secondary position unlike the Renaissance with its fascination with Greek texts and theories.

As the nineteenth century progressed the focus on nature expanded so that human consciousness and its ability to execute Judgment, determination and reflective states of mind while engaged in aesthetic activity became the life work of Kant who prompted a true psychology of art which he called "The Critique of Judgment." This much read work revolutionized aesthetic thinking forever.

Kant laid out principles of how the human mind bridges (through the 5 senses) the inner and outer realms of thought and the outer world of active experience. Kant was fascinated by aesthetics and how the meta-esthetical state of bridging could impact ones moral and ethical understanding. The idea was that nature's beauty and inherent design could filter into the deepest parts of the mind and prompt one to behave harmoniously, lawfully, reflectively and ultimately- morally.

Goethe then took Kant's ideas of the pure beauty of nature and human consciousness and enlarged them by focusing on Kant's interest in the sublime. The sublime has to do with experiences in nature that are so vast that they transcend the minds ability to fully grasp them. Included in the sublime would be the idea of outer-space, the vastness of the sea, mountains which are so large they cannot be fully known, blinding snowstorms, massive earthquakes, the revolving of the earth on its axis, etc.

Goethe said that art should attempt to evoke sublime awe and further, that art was a moral symbol of a state-of-being that was spiritual in essence and awesome because moral laws protect and harmonize society in the same way that the laws of nature keep it in balance.

Goethe stressed the importance of human imagination and its harmonious fusion with the intellect. Let the imagination lead you, he would say onto sublime thoughts and let those thoughts take you to moral insights on the purposes of existence including most importantly, human love which creates the desire for beauty.

Think he would say of how much art has stemmed from the experience of love and of the state of being in love as a sublime mind expanding state of consciousness. It is why we link love and Romance which are beyond our ability to fully understand. They have sublime features and the nineteenth century celebrated love in remarkable and complex ways because of the awe we have of loves power. Examples of a mother who out of love would die to protect a child or a man his family or the heroic ideal of dying for ones country. All of these were themes in 19th century art and literature and why Napoleon was able to convince over a million young Frenchmen to die for him and his romantic ideals of conquest.

Eventually the sublime of Goethe was taken up by many of the above thinkers who added mystical, romantic and religious ideas to the list. Wackenroder for instance said that art is a form of natural religious experience though it had no doctrine specifically. Novalis spoke of a mystical and magical universe which the human imagination was at-one with. There was much talk and poetic expression of the dream-life and even of aesthetic prophecy with the artist seen as a mystic, prophet and seer as in the case of William Blake and Samuel Palmer. Casper David Frederich, the German painter produced art that had mystical, prophetic qualities and was dominated by sublime images of mountains, fog banks, the vastness of the ocean or sky etc. Blake, like Casper Frederich used the Bible for visionary and mystical imagery in addition to seeking it in nature.

There was a renewed interest in Dante's "Divine Comedy" in the nineteenth century because Dante the 14th century Italian poet acted as a prophet and evoked awesome and mind-bogglingly sublime images in his poetic writings. Dore the great French 19th century illustrator illustrated the "Divine Comedy" with sublime views of heaven filled with angelic beings or hell filled with monsters and fearful and monstrous creatures.

So the view of these German thinkers was given powerful expression by artists who called themselves Romantics. The list is long but some of the key nineteenth century artists following Goethe and the other thinkers included in addition to the several listed: Geracault, Goya, Delacroix, Turner, Constable, Van Gogh for example in painting. In literature: Dickens, Hugo, Dostoevsky and in poetry: Wordsworth, Whitman, Emerson, Keats, Coleridge, Byron etc.

Here the poet/painter/writer is a seer who brings us into contact with the infinite, sublime, transcendent in order to transform our limited thinking and move us into deep insights and intentional living.

20 comments:

brett said...

What I thought was so interesting about this reading was when it talk about the power nature can have on a person. I spent my summers growing up on a ranch in wyoming and the landscape there was so amazing that I can't even begin to describe it and no painting or photograph I have seen has ever captured it. That is most likely because when I was there all my senses were involved. Not only did I see a beautiful landscape but I smelled it and felt in the wind and sprinkles of rain. It sounds corny, but thats the way it was. It makes me think about our presentation last week in class when my group talked about the importance the senses play when you experience something.

kristi bock said...

"Art that was based on strong observation and understanding of natural pattern, design, form etc. would therefore have qualities of the unity and balance of nature and in this way would assist humanbeings in achieving a desired inner-harmony and tranquility of mind"what i really found fascinating about this comment is that it shows the connection between humans (artists and viewers) to their art and then the connection between that and nature, its a cycle of connection where all the sums influence one another

Bill Havlicek said...

Brett and Kristi,

I liked the strong connection you both made with this last post. What is clear from your two comments is that you have had powerful experiences with nature through enlisting the five senses which in turn had for you an inner resonance evoking awe, wonder and even harmony as ab at-one-ment with the Cosmos.

We are back to the Greek early thinkers who understood that there is an essential way we humans relate to our universe. We are "in it and of it" in essential ways and the arts make this bond we have with our universe emotionally evident.

Emily Smith said...

I enjoyed the portion of this essay speaking about the rational harmony and purposeful tranquility that art has when it is based on appreciative observation. The naturalistic qualities of eighteenth century art is so inspiring and beautiful. I feel as though this essay speaks of a more methodical and deliberate thought process. I believe implementing these principles into every day living allows for us to enjoy and derive more meaning from our day to day observations.

Travis Poe said...

"sublime has to do with experiences in nature that are so vast that they transcend the minds ability to fully grasp them" As artists, we take these experiences and try to recreate them in our own perspective. Sometimes we can't truly illustrate nature in the same way it is shown because people can take the same subject of art and manipulate it in so many different ways. Even though the subject might be exactly the same, no artist will make the exact same painting. However, when seeing something in Nature, it is not interpreted really by anyone.. It is what it is. To find this sublime feeling can be a really great experience and the Ocean is a great example of something that i feel is very sublime.

Mischa Kavish said...

Goethe's fixation on the sublime is interesting. How is one supposed to portray the sublime and the vastness of the ideas within? Can that sort of idea really be portrayed through a visual cue alone? It seems like it would be better expressed through an essay, or a poem. One can certainly paint space, or a vast ocean, or perhaps an abstract collage of these ideas. But the message will fall on deaf ears unless someone is there to explain what they're trying to say.

Anonymous said...

The sublime can only be seen as mystical by humans because we are not able to grasp it therefore it is deemed something beyond us. I agree with Mischa that it would be difficult to recreate the feeling of the sublime in a single image. But, I don't think it would be impossible. The artist would need to make the person feel like the audience is there and that could be achieved by a very large canvas and believable perspective. It might not capture the same exact feeling that one experiences in person but it would come close.

I think it is true that nature for the most part can evoke morality and harmony in a person. I cant help but think about the the more wild side of nature where one trying to exist in nature is overcome by extreme weather and hungry animals. What then does nature provide as far as morals? I think possibly it become less about balance and morality and more about survival.

Kris said...

I find it interesting that this period after the Renaissance still harps on nature as a huge factor in art though there is more of a tangent toward unverisalism rather than religious connection. This may be due to the fact that there is renewd interest in Greek Classical art, a period heavily influenced by philosophy. There also seems to be a great deal of existensialism in this period which allows for the flow of imagination to explain the unexplainable beyond religion and logic thus the content of art flourishes. These great German thinkers may have even helped the idea of German Abstract Expressionism which I find some of the most amazing art and film and has brought forth one of my favorite films he Cabinet of Dr. Caligari. This film genre gave way to an incredible body of influential film work.

averiendow said...

"the focus on nature expanded so that human consciousness and its ability to execute Judgment, determination and reflective states of mind while engaged in aesthetic activity..."

This statement is so true to what I believe is at the essence of art. This describes the sort of sensory process to making art and how it ties into the very nature of human existence, or what it is to be human. I've found that the topic of human consciousness and interconnection is brought up again and again with philosophers throughout history. It leads me to believe that to capture this connection in art, is to create work that can bestow an aesthetic experience onto both viewer and creator.

Natalie Dye said...

Goethe's views on the importance of human imagination is something I can agree on. Creating that sublime image of nature doesn't have to be done so literally. The fabrics of reality can be twisted and drawn out from the artist's mind at put into a painting or book creating that sublime situation.

heatherpritchett said...

I don't know how I feel about the idea of nature being harmonious and well ordered. There are certainly times when it is, but there are also times when it's nothing but chaos, destruction, and a distinct lack of balance. It's pretty clear that these guys mostly lived safe in doors if they thought that nature was only patterns and beauty and balance. I do see nature as being amazingly beautiful, but as something that's just as much about death and life ending bacteria as it is about beautiful mountain peaks and new life. Idealized nature, like the Greeks ideals of the human body, may be beautiful, but give you a false idea what you're looking at. The sublime absolutely exists in nature, but something so overwhelmingly beautiful is almost always also overwhelmingly destructive, like the cold vacuum of space and storms at sea.

courtney maya said...

"Nature was a model of what art and harmonious human existence should be for nature revealed clarity, utility and order. So it occurred to thinkers that a well-functioning mind should likewise be clear, balanced and well-functioning."

While I know that many brilliant art minds find beauty in the chaos, personally I find beauty in clarity and order. I am most inspired by the natural beauty of nature, and that even despite the chaos and natural disasters, there is still a sense of order. Things will always find a way to live and grow.

Nature has a big impact on me, and I agree with my other classmates who believe in the importance of having all 5 senses involved. A painting or a photograph of nature is not enough, you must live it, breathe it, and feel it in order to gain the full aesthetic experience.

Anonymous said...

The 19th century ideas of a creative persons acting as a bridge for people to see their own lives from an intentional perspective is why I identify with this time period so strongly. The notion of artists being mystics hits very close to home for me because I see our artist's role as guides or creators of signposts for people traveling on a path of self discovery through nature. Like, Goethe I also believe that we should aim for art that brings awe into the lives of people and lifts the souls of those that are willingly participating by inspiring them to an idealized human expression that is spearheaded by a sense of compassion towards others. I enjoyed reading how Goethe stressed the importance of harmonizing ones imagination with our intellect. I find that after years of following my curiosity, this idea of fusing these two aspects of myself is what has made the adventure of creating paintings much more fulfilling.

konstantinople said...

wow . it all makes so much more sense after reading this . the entire history of art becomes tangible . as for returning to greek idea of the beauty and returning to in a way back to ourselves . our bodies and surroundings .

Sam L Willson said...

I can relate to the idea the nature is a model of what art and harmonious human existence should be. In my art, I try to mimic nature to create believable characters in my animation. I also love to sculpt, and I really admire the Greek sculptures for their beautiful representation of anatomy and the human form.

Patrick Murray said...

The sublime is the ultimate form of aesthetic experience and usually one that has the most long standing impact on people. the sublime revels inter truths about man and the collective conscious through the senses. I really enjoy the idea of the sublime and how the artist is the bridge between the receiver and the sublime. its almost like its something that we have always know and always carted about but never knew it even existed is reveled to us in a way that we could have never imagined on out own. the intermediary between the the truths in life and the world as we know it. It is interesting that it took so many years of aesthetic research to come to this conclusion that life contains so much rich information and ideas that there is no single way of containing it.

Camilla said...

"Goethe stressed the importance of human imagination and its harmonious fusion with the intellect. Let the imagination lead you, he would say onto sublime thoughts and let those thoughts take you to moral insights on the purposes of existence including most importantly, human love which creates the desire for beauty. "

I found Goethe's statements to be very interesting. Creative people can probably all agree on the importance of imagination in our work and in our lives. But i've never heard someone place such heavy implications on it as Goethe. Imagination connecting to intellect then leading to the discovery of greater meaning about morals, existence and love. This is much more than just creative day dreaming. It's almost a life philosophy. It makes me think of a real life situation of a co-worker whose grandchild was dubbed by a teacher as having "an over active imagination", as a negative characteristic. Even when I was in grade school I was constantly punished for doodling in notebooks and staring out classroom windows. It seems now more than ever we are trying to stuff down the imaginations of children at a young age with TV or pills and keeping them indoors more than letting them play outside and just be kids. Given the the weight that Goethe places on the imagination and the strong connection to moral insight about existence, love and beauty - leads me to worry about the effects of discouraging imagination in children, especially with regards to their intellectual and emotional development into fulfilled adults. Especially because if my active imagination as a child had been as heavily discouraged as it is today (treated as ADD and had pills thrown at me) then it's possible I would never have found my passion and the road I'm on now to becoming a creative professional.

Gabby Untermayerova said...

It's not difficult to see why nature had taken a prevalent role in art and philosophy. Comind from the Renaissance which took the individual and developed the idea of personal growth and ambition to the development of strict moral guidelines through the 17th and 18th centuries. The idea that the only true spiritual, sublime or universal truths to be real coming from nature only made sense. Nature is the one thing that we can all agree is real, and its laws what are beyond us. And the idea to focus on something larger than the individual was liberating. In terms of art and the social context nature was the the only constant. Henry David Thoreau even took nature as the only source of true order and goes to length to explain how being in harmony with nature and its laws holds us together more as humans than following our own rules.

SiSi Chen said...

I agree with Gabby that it makes sense that it made sense for nature to have a prevalent role at the time. It is true that nature is a common ground for all people, and probably one of the few common grounds we can all share. Nature is also an endless source for symmetry. Going back to one of the first classes when we watched the video on beauty, we learned that symmetry is a large part of what determines what is beautiful, and where better to look than nature where it's on every leaf and insect. I also find it fascinating that once again people looked to the classics as art and history makes a full cycle.

DanSTC said...

Naturalism of Greek art had a lot of appeal in the 'age of reason' unsurprisingly. However there are a few aspects of the Greeks that I have a bone to pick with - particularly Plato. The Ionians were arguably the earliest example of people trying out what would later evolve into the scientific method. They loved the natural world too - whereas Plato hated it. A lot of Plato's ideas would actually carry over into the 'dark ages' which would relegate knowledge to a select few, and insist upon the imperfection and nastiness of the physical world. There's a reason why we call non-physical non-sexualized love 'Platonic.' The mad old cave-dwelling geezer was obsessed with purity and divorcing himself from the natural world.

Anyway, a good deal of the 'age of reason' actually managed to shake off the Platonic ideas that had basically helped shut down science for hundreds of years.